
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Single Payer Healthcare</title>
	<atom:link href="http://studentdoctor.net/2008/10/single-payer-healthcare/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://studentdoctor.net/2008/10/single-payer-healthcare/</link>
	<description>A nonprofit educational organization</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 13:33:39 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Desmotivaciones</title>
		<link>http://studentdoctor.net/2008/10/single-payer-healthcare/#comment-13293</link>
		<dc:creator>Desmotivaciones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 13:41:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://studentdoctor.net/?p=591#comment-13293</guid>
		<description>thank you for sharing with us, I  believe  this website really  stands out : D.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thank you for sharing with us, I  believe  this website really  stands out : D.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graeme</title>
		<link>http://studentdoctor.net/2008/10/single-payer-healthcare/#comment-2226</link>
		<dc:creator>Graeme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 14:09:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://studentdoctor.net/?p=591#comment-2226</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s often missing from the health care debate -- and what frustrates me to no end -- is the absence of discussion on a third type of health care payment model: universal multi-payer.

Switzerland, the Netherlands, Germany, France, and Belgium all deliver universal health care through a combination of public and (carefully-regulated) private insurance programs. These systems provide the best of both worlds: everyone is guaranteed coverage, but those who want to customize their health care packages have the option of doing so.

The health care debate is often falsely presented as a dichotomy between single-payer models on the one hand and &quot;American-style&quot; models on the other, when in reality there are many models out there that successfully provide the best of both worlds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s often missing from the health care debate &#8212; and what frustrates me to no end &#8212; is the absence of discussion on a third type of health care payment model: universal multi-payer.</p>
<p>Switzerland, the Netherlands, Germany, France, and Belgium all deliver universal health care through a combination of public and (carefully-regulated) private insurance programs. These systems provide the best of both worlds: everyone is guaranteed coverage, but those who want to customize their health care packages have the option of doing so.</p>
<p>The health care debate is often falsely presented as a dichotomy between single-payer models on the one hand and &#8220;American-style&#8221; models on the other, when in reality there are many models out there that successfully provide the best of both worlds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: travis</title>
		<link>http://studentdoctor.net/2008/10/single-payer-healthcare/#comment-2225</link>
		<dc:creator>travis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 02:09:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://studentdoctor.net/?p=591#comment-2225</guid>
		<description>You are a fool if you think there can exist a government financed health care system that is not ultimately government run.  

Ask yourselves this. How many VA, tricare, medicaid or medicare doctors are happy?  Why would another government financed program be any different?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are a fool if you think there can exist a government financed health care system that is not ultimately government run.  </p>
<p>Ask yourselves this. How many VA, tricare, medicaid or medicare doctors are happy?  Why would another government financed program be any different?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: H. Green, MD</title>
		<link>http://studentdoctor.net/2008/10/single-payer-healthcare/#comment-2224</link>
		<dc:creator>H. Green, MD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 04:17:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://studentdoctor.net/?p=591#comment-2224</guid>
		<description>The following 9 steps will simply suggest how, without the inefficiencies and burden to productivity of private insurance corporations, we can deliver efficient and effective comprehensive health care with great savings and no sacrifice of jobs.  In fact, we may be able to decrease morbidity and mortality in this Country with one coordinated system which cares for all Americans, and concurrently analyzes optimal diagnoses and treatment modalities through its integrated computerized billing system.  The savings incurred insuring all Americans through the more efficient Medicare system will benefit all citizens of our Country.

        9 Steps to Comprehensive Quality Health Care in America

1) Shut down the private health insurance corporations.       

2) Enroll all Americans (including Veterans) and the 40 million uninsured citizens into the Medicare Health Insurance Corporation.  Since the current functioning Medicare Insurance Company is already accepted by almost all physicians, Hospitals and clinics in the Country, hardly any infrastructure investments on the health care delivery end will be necessary. Have all private businesses pay a Medicare premium for their employees instead of private health insurance premiums.  Let employees as well as businesses contribute a fixed premium amount based on their age up until 65 for their Medicare services and drugs.  Freeze current premiums for all Americans over 65 and adjust in the future according to the cost of living index.  These premiums paid by businesses to Medicare for their employees should be less than that paid to current private insurance companies because of the lower overhead costs of the Medicare Corporation and improved risk distribution. 

3)  Hire the now unemployed former private health insurance corporate bureaucrats to actually deliver and not inhibit health care by working in hospitals, doctors’ offices, clinics and nursing homes around our Country.  Demographically, the percentage of elderly Americans is rapidly increasing.   With every American now insured through Universal Medicare Insurance, real health care workers will be in desperate need.   For the first time in the brief but bloody history of managed care, these former private insurance corporation employees will actually touch and improve care for patients by working in physical therapy, nursing, home health care and other ancillary patient care capacities.       
         
4) Obtain by eminent domain (for the public good) the best of the intellectual property protected computer codes which the closed private insurance businesses previously used to monitor patient care and doctors utilization and performance.  Private health insurance companies have used these computer programs exclusively for the purpose of strong-arming their contracted health care providers into doing less for their patients and increasing the premium costs for sicker patients in order to achieve higher corporate profits.   Medicare on the other hand can use these same computer programs for the common good; to monitor, collect data and eventually improve the efficacy of diagnoses and the treatment of diseases and medical outcomes every time a doctor submits a bill. For example, wouldn&#039;t it be nice to know as a medical consumer (patient) which oncology groups in Boston, New York or Houston have the highest cure rates for stage III breast cancer or Stage II prostate cancer?  All those numbers currently exist in cancer registries nation wide and just need to be collected and honestly disseminated.   Currently, instead of solid medical data which delineates morbidity and mortality and performance, the medical consumer when choosing an oncologist must rely on word of mouth, physician referrals or advertisements in the local papers which show photographs of smiling doctors in white coats who claim to be the ‘best’ doctors in town.  In addition to garnering invaluable instantaneous epidemiologic data on diagnoses and treatment of diseases based on severity and other variables, a strong Medicare based utilization review computer code would also allow Medicare to monitor doctors and hospitals who abuse a fee-for-service billing system. Any physician, institution or service found to abuse the Medicare fee for service billing system after proper review and appeal should be dealt with severely through stiff penalties and loss of their Universal Medicare provider contract.   
           
5) Freeze Medicare physician, hospital and ancillary services reimbursements at current 2007-2008 levels. Adjust reimbursements for future services yearly by Cost of Living increases, or in the event of a deflationary economy a decreases in doctor and hospital payments.  Ask any physician and they&#039;ll tell you they would accept current reimbursement rates with COLA over the current mysterious illogical fee adjustment system of Medicare, or the physician population density reimbursement formula used by most private insurance corporations.  Two tiered medical systems separating the “haves and have not’s” of society have and will always exist. Therefore, we must allow physicians to practice medicine without enrolling in or accepting the Universal Medicare reimbursement.  With private medical insurance no longer available, and no performance based evidence for improved morbidity and mortality among their private for-pay patients, these extraordinarily expensive private ‘VIP’ practices will be limited. 

6) Allow Medicare, much like the current Veterans Administration System and every private health insurance company and government health care system around the world, to bid on medications from pharmaceutical corporations for its Medicare drug formulary.  Every physician recognizes that we don’t need a choice of a dozen redundant drugs in each pharmaceutical category.  For example, we need only 2-3 statins for cholesterol, a handful of antibiotics for infections,  2 beta blockers for hypertension, and a few pain killers.   Once the Government bids on pharmaceuticals for the Medicare Corporation formulary, macro economics will force prices to massively decrease to levels identical to that which all the other people of the world outside of America are paying for the same medicines.  Since it has not effectively decreased morbidity or mortality in this Country, and only wastes money, we should also prohibit pharmaceutical companies and their workers from contributing to political campaigns or buying commercials on the public airways.  We need to also prohibit the current practice whereby your local  pharmacy and pharmacist sells your private medical diagnoses and your doctors private prescribing drug information to pharmaceutical companies so the pharmaceutical companies in-turn can directly pressure-market physicians.  Prohibit pharmaceutical companies from contributing to organized medicine societies, colleges or associations because the doctors can’t rely on soft bribes or free lunches to prescribe what’s best for their patients.  Prevent pharmaceutical representatives from visiting doctors’ offices or hospital pharmacies directly. Allow delivery of Medicare formulary approved sample medications for patients to physicians’ offices via post office mail only.  Allow pharmaceutical companies to market products to physicians only via peer reviewed publications delivered by email or snail mail.

7)   With the savings incurred from closing the private insurance corporations and paying less for drugs, have the American government fully fund the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the National Cancer Institute (NCI) and Small Business Innovative Research (SBIR) programs.  Emphasis should be placed on basic bench research carried out at not-for-profit American Institutions which employ or utilize a majority of American Citizens in their laboratories and clinics. Too often American Universities rely on free overseas labor to conduct bench research.  Clinical trials should emphasize new drugs and devices which have promise to significantly decrease morbidity and mortality for any disease, including orphan diseases.   Since a large percentage of private funding for drug and device studies will originate in the expanding financial liquidity and innovations and patients of the emerging developing world, we should allow the FDA to utilize research data obtained by reproduced laboratory and clinical studies performed overseas as well as in this Country.  
   
Corruption of honest academics should be curtailed.   Force all investigators to release reproduced publicly funded scientific data for all scientists to review on the internet via the Freedom of Information act (The Senator Shelby Amendment).  Prohibit rights of first refusal on scientific data for private companies performing research in non-for profit institutions which receive public funding. Any rights to profits obtained from intellectual property and patents invented with combined funding from government and private sources should be split fairly among the contributing government institutions and any other private corporations funding the research, as well as with the individual inventor.  Prevent organized medicine societies, associations or colleges from contributing to political campaigns since campaign donations have no relevance for physician performance or patient morbidity or mortality.   

8) Offer physicians the same legal protection from malpractice lawsuits which have been established for commercial health insurance corporations during the last 3 decades.

9) The quality of current medical records software lags two decades behind business software. Therefore, we need to fund and challenge America’s best software corporations to finally develop standardized electronic medical records software for use in doctors’ offices and hospitals in order to increase the efficiency and productivity of physician charting, billing and prescribing.  We should use the integrated medical records system to instantaneously and confidentially gather important epidemiologic data on physicians’ performance, patient diseases, and treatments.  With new potent viruses and unsophisticated biomedical and nuclear warfare on the horizon, this system will be absolutely necessary for rapid National Security responses.   Protect patient confidentiality at all costs to prevent the commercialization and abuse of patient data like that which the pharmacies trade today.

Lastly, some argue that Universal Government run health care in America will result in delays in diagnosis and treatment similar to those experienced in Britain and Canada.  One can not simply compare the massive extremely functional Medicare insurance corporation based infrastructure which seamlessly delivers health care to tens of millions of people yearly in the USA to the government run westernized health care systems of Canada and Britain, France, Switzerland, Netherlands, Scandinavia,  and Israel.  America, for the last 40 years, thanks to the government run health insurance corporation-Medicare, has built an incredibly dense and fluid public insurance system involving almost all doctors’ offices, hospitals, clinics and ancillary services.  The Medicare system dwarfs in breadth and actual practitioners and efficacy the lesser insurance systems established in all other countries. The billing and reimbursement bureaucracy for health care providers contracted with Medicare Insurance is already relatively streamlined and efficiently centralized in America thanks to 40 years of physician, hospitals and government cooperation.

We all know that the medically bankrupt private health insurance corporations and medical malpractice lawsuit threats have caused many disheartened physicians to quit practicing or downsize their practices in America.  A continuation and technological upgrading of our most fair Universal Medicare based health insurance Corporation based on the concepts outlined above would undoubtedly motivate those disenfranchised physicians to return to the profession and bright younger physicians to invigorate the field.   If patients, physicians and the Medicare Corporation continue to work together, without the deleterious interference of private for-profit health insurance corporations, malpractice threats and overt pharmaceutical marketing,  the future for American health care will be healthy indeed..  A continuation of the status-quo mixture of a government subsidized private health maintenance insurance industry operating parallel to and within Medicare is wasteful, and will continue to provide no potential future health improvements for America.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The following 9 steps will simply suggest how, without the inefficiencies and burden to productivity of private insurance corporations, we can deliver efficient and effective comprehensive health care with great savings and no sacrifice of jobs.  In fact, we may be able to decrease morbidity and mortality in this Country with one coordinated system which cares for all Americans, and concurrently analyzes optimal diagnoses and treatment modalities through its integrated computerized billing system.  The savings incurred insuring all Americans through the more efficient Medicare system will benefit all citizens of our Country.</p>
<p>        9 Steps to Comprehensive Quality Health Care in America</p>
<p>1) Shut down the private health insurance corporations.       </p>
<p>2) Enroll all Americans (including Veterans) and the 40 million uninsured citizens into the Medicare Health Insurance Corporation.  Since the current functioning Medicare Insurance Company is already accepted by almost all physicians, Hospitals and clinics in the Country, hardly any infrastructure investments on the health care delivery end will be necessary. Have all private businesses pay a Medicare premium for their employees instead of private health insurance premiums.  Let employees as well as businesses contribute a fixed premium amount based on their age up until 65 for their Medicare services and drugs.  Freeze current premiums for all Americans over 65 and adjust in the future according to the cost of living index.  These premiums paid by businesses to Medicare for their employees should be less than that paid to current private insurance companies because of the lower overhead costs of the Medicare Corporation and improved risk distribution. </p>
<p>3)  Hire the now unemployed former private health insurance corporate bureaucrats to actually deliver and not inhibit health care by working in hospitals, doctors’ offices, clinics and nursing homes around our Country.  Demographically, the percentage of elderly Americans is rapidly increasing.   With every American now insured through Universal Medicare Insurance, real health care workers will be in desperate need.   For the first time in the brief but bloody history of managed care, these former private insurance corporation employees will actually touch and improve care for patients by working in physical therapy, nursing, home health care and other ancillary patient care capacities.       </p>
<p>4) Obtain by eminent domain (for the public good) the best of the intellectual property protected computer codes which the closed private insurance businesses previously used to monitor patient care and doctors utilization and performance.  Private health insurance companies have used these computer programs exclusively for the purpose of strong-arming their contracted health care providers into doing less for their patients and increasing the premium costs for sicker patients in order to achieve higher corporate profits.   Medicare on the other hand can use these same computer programs for the common good; to monitor, collect data and eventually improve the efficacy of diagnoses and the treatment of diseases and medical outcomes every time a doctor submits a bill. For example, wouldn&#8217;t it be nice to know as a medical consumer (patient) which oncology groups in Boston, New York or Houston have the highest cure rates for stage III breast cancer or Stage II prostate cancer?  All those numbers currently exist in cancer registries nation wide and just need to be collected and honestly disseminated.   Currently, instead of solid medical data which delineates morbidity and mortality and performance, the medical consumer when choosing an oncologist must rely on word of mouth, physician referrals or advertisements in the local papers which show photographs of smiling doctors in white coats who claim to be the ‘best’ doctors in town.  In addition to garnering invaluable instantaneous epidemiologic data on diagnoses and treatment of diseases based on severity and other variables, a strong Medicare based utilization review computer code would also allow Medicare to monitor doctors and hospitals who abuse a fee-for-service billing system. Any physician, institution or service found to abuse the Medicare fee for service billing system after proper review and appeal should be dealt with severely through stiff penalties and loss of their Universal Medicare provider contract.   </p>
<p>5) Freeze Medicare physician, hospital and ancillary services reimbursements at current 2007-2008 levels. Adjust reimbursements for future services yearly by Cost of Living increases, or in the event of a deflationary economy a decreases in doctor and hospital payments.  Ask any physician and they&#8217;ll tell you they would accept current reimbursement rates with COLA over the current mysterious illogical fee adjustment system of Medicare, or the physician population density reimbursement formula used by most private insurance corporations.  Two tiered medical systems separating the “haves and have not’s” of society have and will always exist. Therefore, we must allow physicians to practice medicine without enrolling in or accepting the Universal Medicare reimbursement.  With private medical insurance no longer available, and no performance based evidence for improved morbidity and mortality among their private for-pay patients, these extraordinarily expensive private ‘VIP’ practices will be limited. </p>
<p>6) Allow Medicare, much like the current Veterans Administration System and every private health insurance company and government health care system around the world, to bid on medications from pharmaceutical corporations for its Medicare drug formulary.  Every physician recognizes that we don’t need a choice of a dozen redundant drugs in each pharmaceutical category.  For example, we need only 2-3 statins for cholesterol, a handful of antibiotics for infections,  2 beta blockers for hypertension, and a few pain killers.   Once the Government bids on pharmaceuticals for the Medicare Corporation formulary, macro economics will force prices to massively decrease to levels identical to that which all the other people of the world outside of America are paying for the same medicines.  Since it has not effectively decreased morbidity or mortality in this Country, and only wastes money, we should also prohibit pharmaceutical companies and their workers from contributing to political campaigns or buying commercials on the public airways.  We need to also prohibit the current practice whereby your local  pharmacy and pharmacist sells your private medical diagnoses and your doctors private prescribing drug information to pharmaceutical companies so the pharmaceutical companies in-turn can directly pressure-market physicians.  Prohibit pharmaceutical companies from contributing to organized medicine societies, colleges or associations because the doctors can’t rely on soft bribes or free lunches to prescribe what’s best for their patients.  Prevent pharmaceutical representatives from visiting doctors’ offices or hospital pharmacies directly. Allow delivery of Medicare formulary approved sample medications for patients to physicians’ offices via post office mail only.  Allow pharmaceutical companies to market products to physicians only via peer reviewed publications delivered by email or snail mail.</p>
<p>7)   With the savings incurred from closing the private insurance corporations and paying less for drugs, have the American government fully fund the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the National Cancer Institute (NCI) and Small Business Innovative Research (SBIR) programs.  Emphasis should be placed on basic bench research carried out at not-for-profit American Institutions which employ or utilize a majority of American Citizens in their laboratories and clinics. Too often American Universities rely on free overseas labor to conduct bench research.  Clinical trials should emphasize new drugs and devices which have promise to significantly decrease morbidity and mortality for any disease, including orphan diseases.   Since a large percentage of private funding for drug and device studies will originate in the expanding financial liquidity and innovations and patients of the emerging developing world, we should allow the FDA to utilize research data obtained by reproduced laboratory and clinical studies performed overseas as well as in this Country.  </p>
<p>Corruption of honest academics should be curtailed.   Force all investigators to release reproduced publicly funded scientific data for all scientists to review on the internet via the Freedom of Information act (The Senator Shelby Amendment).  Prohibit rights of first refusal on scientific data for private companies performing research in non-for profit institutions which receive public funding. Any rights to profits obtained from intellectual property and patents invented with combined funding from government and private sources should be split fairly among the contributing government institutions and any other private corporations funding the research, as well as with the individual inventor.  Prevent organized medicine societies, associations or colleges from contributing to political campaigns since campaign donations have no relevance for physician performance or patient morbidity or mortality.   </p>
<p> <img src='http://studentdoctor.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_cool.gif' alt='8)' class='wp-smiley' /> Offer physicians the same legal protection from malpractice lawsuits which have been established for commercial health insurance corporations during the last 3 decades.</p>
<p>9) The quality of current medical records software lags two decades behind business software. Therefore, we need to fund and challenge America’s best software corporations to finally develop standardized electronic medical records software for use in doctors’ offices and hospitals in order to increase the efficiency and productivity of physician charting, billing and prescribing.  We should use the integrated medical records system to instantaneously and confidentially gather important epidemiologic data on physicians’ performance, patient diseases, and treatments.  With new potent viruses and unsophisticated biomedical and nuclear warfare on the horizon, this system will be absolutely necessary for rapid National Security responses.   Protect patient confidentiality at all costs to prevent the commercialization and abuse of patient data like that which the pharmacies trade today.</p>
<p>Lastly, some argue that Universal Government run health care in America will result in delays in diagnosis and treatment similar to those experienced in Britain and Canada.  One can not simply compare the massive extremely functional Medicare insurance corporation based infrastructure which seamlessly delivers health care to tens of millions of people yearly in the USA to the government run westernized health care systems of Canada and Britain, France, Switzerland, Netherlands, Scandinavia,  and Israel.  America, for the last 40 years, thanks to the government run health insurance corporation-Medicare, has built an incredibly dense and fluid public insurance system involving almost all doctors’ offices, hospitals, clinics and ancillary services.  The Medicare system dwarfs in breadth and actual practitioners and efficacy the lesser insurance systems established in all other countries. The billing and reimbursement bureaucracy for health care providers contracted with Medicare Insurance is already relatively streamlined and efficiently centralized in America thanks to 40 years of physician, hospitals and government cooperation.</p>
<p>We all know that the medically bankrupt private health insurance corporations and medical malpractice lawsuit threats have caused many disheartened physicians to quit practicing or downsize their practices in America.  A continuation and technological upgrading of our most fair Universal Medicare based health insurance Corporation based on the concepts outlined above would undoubtedly motivate those disenfranchised physicians to return to the profession and bright younger physicians to invigorate the field.   If patients, physicians and the Medicare Corporation continue to work together, without the deleterious interference of private for-profit health insurance corporations, malpractice threats and overt pharmaceutical marketing,  the future for American health care will be healthy indeed..  A continuation of the status-quo mixture of a government subsidized private health maintenance insurance industry operating parallel to and within Medicare is wasteful, and will continue to provide no potential future health improvements for America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PNHP</title>
		<link>http://studentdoctor.net/2008/10/single-payer-healthcare/#comment-2223</link>
		<dc:creator>PNHP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 00:53:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://studentdoctor.net/?p=591#comment-2223</guid>
		<description>Have you ever worked in an ED?  Thats all I need to say right there...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you ever worked in an ED?  Thats all I need to say right there&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dissapointed</title>
		<link>http://studentdoctor.net/2008/10/single-payer-healthcare/#comment-2222</link>
		<dc:creator>Dissapointed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 04:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://studentdoctor.net/?p=591#comment-2222</guid>
		<description>Hey PHNP-- &quot;ours is pretty bad for those that can&#039;t get into it&quot; ???? Are you trying to say that America&#039;s system is bad because some can&#039;t get treatment?  Everyone in america can go to an emergency room at anytime and receive treatment.  Everyone &quot;can get into&quot; our health care system.  Maybe you are confusing uninsured with unable to receive treatment.  We always hear that 47 million or so people in america don&#039;t have insurance.  This doesn&#039;t mean they don&#039;t have health care. I still don&#039;t know what your argument is against a free market system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey PHNP&#8211; &#8220;ours is pretty bad for those that can&#8217;t get into it&#8221; ???? Are you trying to say that America&#8217;s system is bad because some can&#8217;t get treatment?  Everyone in america can go to an emergency room at anytime and receive treatment.  Everyone &#8220;can get into&#8221; our health care system.  Maybe you are confusing uninsured with unable to receive treatment.  We always hear that 47 million or so people in america don&#8217;t have insurance.  This doesn&#8217;t mean they don&#8217;t have health care. I still don&#8217;t know what your argument is against a free market system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PNHP</title>
		<link>http://studentdoctor.net/2008/10/single-payer-healthcare/#comment-2221</link>
		<dc:creator>PNHP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 00:13:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://studentdoctor.net/?p=591#comment-2221</guid>
		<description>I like the AMA talking point above (The Swiss system).  People concerned that people will just go crazy cause it is free must not have ever had a colonoscopy.  If we make it a free market system, no one would ever get screened (think of it like your car, do you get regular tune ups once it has passed warrenty, or do you keep driving it even when the light comes on), whatever state has the least regulations will become the haven that all insurance companies set up shop in (look at small companies and how many are based out of Delaware).  The Canadian system is underfunded, the British system is true socialized medicine and has its issues, but ours is pretty bad for those that can&#039;t get into it.  I don&#039;t know what the solution is, but its not a free market</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the AMA talking point above (The Swiss system).  People concerned that people will just go crazy cause it is free must not have ever had a colonoscopy.  If we make it a free market system, no one would ever get screened (think of it like your car, do you get regular tune ups once it has passed warrenty, or do you keep driving it even when the light comes on), whatever state has the least regulations will become the haven that all insurance companies set up shop in (look at small companies and how many are based out of Delaware).  The Canadian system is underfunded, the British system is true socialized medicine and has its issues, but ours is pretty bad for those that can&#8217;t get into it.  I don&#8217;t know what the solution is, but its not a free market</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dissapointed</title>
		<link>http://studentdoctor.net/2008/10/single-payer-healthcare/#comment-2220</link>
		<dc:creator>Dissapointed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 08:21:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://studentdoctor.net/?p=591#comment-2220</guid>
		<description>Come on student doc, you reveal your bias by only publishing articles on health care that have liberal viewpoints.  You promised to show both views of the health care reform and you have yet to present articles of a conservative viewpoint.  Also, anyone who cites Michael Moore&#039;s &quot;Sicko&quot; as evidence in an argument looses all credibility in my view. Health care is expensive and will be.  We can choose to pay for health care through taxes and have the government manage our care or we can embrace a free market system that will encourage competition--driving prices down and increasing efficiency.  Who do you trust? The government or yourself?  As for me, I trust myself and the free market principles that have led to America&#039;s greatness.   Like the vast majority of liberal ideas, health care for all sounds great, but fails every time its tried.  Just ask Hawaii (socialized medicine for children failed), Canada, or Europe.  I don&#039;t want their problems and the inefficiencies associated with government run health care.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Come on student doc, you reveal your bias by only publishing articles on health care that have liberal viewpoints.  You promised to show both views of the health care reform and you have yet to present articles of a conservative viewpoint.  Also, anyone who cites Michael Moore&#8217;s &#8220;Sicko&#8221; as evidence in an argument looses all credibility in my view. Health care is expensive and will be.  We can choose to pay for health care through taxes and have the government manage our care or we can embrace a free market system that will encourage competition&#8211;driving prices down and increasing efficiency.  Who do you trust? The government or yourself?  As for me, I trust myself and the free market principles that have led to America&#8217;s greatness.   Like the vast majority of liberal ideas, health care for all sounds great, but fails every time its tried.  Just ask Hawaii (socialized medicine for children failed), Canada, or Europe.  I don&#8217;t want their problems and the inefficiencies associated with government run health care.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OldPsychDoc</title>
		<link>http://studentdoctor.net/2008/10/single-payer-healthcare/#comment-2219</link>
		<dc:creator>OldPsychDoc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 17:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://studentdoctor.net/?p=591#comment-2219</guid>
		<description>You all should read &quot;Health Care Guaranteed&quot;, by Ezekiel Emanuel, MD, for a sketch of how a non-governmental, non-single payer universal coverage system might work--and save taxpayers millions.
It is especially imperative to read this book, given that the author&#039;s brother, Rahm Emanuel, is being named as a likely Obama White House Chief of Staff!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You all should read &#8220;Health Care Guaranteed&#8221;, by Ezekiel Emanuel, MD, for a sketch of how a non-governmental, non-single payer universal coverage system might work&#8211;and save taxpayers millions.<br />
It is especially imperative to read this book, given that the author&#8217;s brother, Rahm Emanuel, is being named as a likely Obama White House Chief of Staff!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DOinMS</title>
		<link>http://studentdoctor.net/2008/10/single-payer-healthcare/#comment-2218</link>
		<dc:creator>DOinMS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 07:22:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://studentdoctor.net/?p=591#comment-2218</guid>
		<description>The following salaries represent the 50th percentile for the respective specialties:

Anesthesiologists: 309,600; Family Practice: 162,000; Internal Medicine: 169,500; ED: 228,000; General Surgery: 368,200

Please keep in mind that these figures represent what is &quot;taken home,&quot; not what is earned by the practice. Small businesses, including private practices, stand to suffer from these proposed taxing policies (that seem to change with each speech).
Finally, Medicare and state programs are broke because of the abuses - period. Loose inclusion criteria enacted for political gain allow individuals who should not be covered to be covered. Anyone who participates in DIRECT patient care should know this after their first shift.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The following salaries represent the 50th percentile for the respective specialties:</p>
<p>Anesthesiologists: 309,600; Family Practice: 162,000; Internal Medicine: 169,500; ED: 228,000; General Surgery: 368,200</p>
<p>Please keep in mind that these figures represent what is &#8220;taken home,&#8221; not what is earned by the practice. Small businesses, including private practices, stand to suffer from these proposed taxing policies (that seem to change with each speech).<br />
Finally, Medicare and state programs are broke because of the abuses &#8211; period. Loose inclusion criteria enacted for political gain allow individuals who should not be covered to be covered. Anyone who participates in DIRECT patient care should know this after their first shift.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

