Ask questions about this school. Answers use aggregated data and are subject to error.
👋Hi there! How can I help?
Overall, applicants ranked the school in the top 39% of interviews, indicating it is moderately regarded. They found the interview very impressive with a low stress level and felt they did well.
Generally favorable experience overall, applicants reported positive interactions with some minor issues noted.
Based on 283 responses
Score Reference:
9–10 Exceptional8–8.9 Very Good7–7.9 Good6–6.9 Mixed< 6 Needs Improvement
The SDN Interview Experience Score (SIES) is a composite metric that represents applicants overall impressions of their interview experience, based on multiple factors such as professionalism, facilities, responsiveness, and stress levels.
What was the stress level of the interview?
Most respondents rated their interview as low stress.
How do you rank this school among ALL other schools?
Most respondents rank this school above all other schools.
How did the interview impress you?
Most respondents felt positively about their interview.
Positively (89%)
No change (11%)
How you think you did?
Most respondents thought they performed well at the interview.
Great (36%)
Good (48%)
Average (16%)
What are your general comments?
Applicants generally expressed appreciation for the strong faculty support and emphasis on primary care, but some had concerns about the diversity lecture and the location of the school. Overall, the interview process was seen as relaxed and conversational, with a focus on the school's mission and commitment to student wellness.
Top 5 Responses: (Click below to see additional responses)
Emphasis on primary care though the match list is strong, impressed by student wellness and friendliness of faculty, but confused about clincal years
As a diverse applicant, I wish they had made an effort to match me with interviewers who understand my experience, or at least have faculty interviewers receptive /ask about what makes my experience and path to medicine unique
What an amazing faculty from my short experience. I never thought I would be treated with so much respect and kindness in a medical school interview. Nobody talked down to me, but treated my experience as valuable and overall treated me as a peer in medicine, not an underling.
I think I'd be really happy going to school here because of the quality of the education. Their mission isn't just something they say they care about but there's a strong sense that the faculty lives and dies by it. Geisinger also has a strong network throughout the region. I do not, however, love the location of the school.
The interview day was very relaxed and I was extremely impressed by the school. TCMC wasn't very high on my list before interviewing, but afterwards it was my #1 choice.
Loved the school. Interviewed at a few placed beforehand but none impressed me as much as TCMC did. Even though they are new, they are definitely going places.
Really great school. I was skeptical about Scranton, but it's actually a lovely city. The people are wonderful and very enthusiastic about the medical school. Really great experience.
This is a very good school. If you have an interview here, just be yourself. The faculty and students are nice, and they do their best to make you feel at ease.
My interview was extremely conversational. They only asked me one tough question. It was not stressful by any means. Some of the other students said that they were asked many of the questions that are posted on this forum. It really depends on who interviews you. Some people were asked ethical questions and what they would do in a particular situation. Another student was asked to describe herself in three words. Don't get too worried about it just be prepared and you will be fine.
Liked TCMC a lot. Great mission. Great commitment. And think it has an educational model that is a necessary addition to the medical school system in the US. Also, students seemed so relaxed and happy.
This school is definitely going exciting places. If you have drive and want to be involved in shaping the future of a medical school, this is the place to be. Can't wait to see what happens to them over the next couple years!
One of the other posters in the interview feedback said that the new building would be ready in 2012, but I think we were told that the building would be done in late spring of 2011. So if we were part of the 2014 class, we would get the building starting in the fall of our second year.
TCMC-COMP interviews are an average of 47 minutes, with an average of 2 interviews. 94% of interviews are one-on-one, 0% are in-person, and 29% are closed-file.
What is one of the specific questions they asked you?
The most commonly asked interview questions at medical schools include inquiries about the difference between empathy and sympathy, reasons for pursuing a career in medicine, discussions on strengths and weaknesses, and scenarios related to patient care and interpersonal skills. Many respondents mentioned questions specific to the Multiple Mini Interview (MMI) format and potential nondisclosure agreements, such as scenarios involving cultural sensitivity and ethical dilemmas.
Top 5 Responses: (Click below to see additional responses)
Students said most interesting question asked at The Commonwealth Medical College discussed a wide range of topics including customer service in medicine, personal experiences influencing medical practice, family dynamics, career transitions, ethics, and healthcare system preferences. The interview format may have been an MMI (Multiple Mini Interview) as some respondents mentioned personal questions and scenarios, while others elaborated on their views on healthcare and medical training, with a few expressing interest in ethical dilemmas and healthcare challenges.
Top 5 Responses: (Click below to see additional responses)
Tell me more about your customer service experience and how it relates to medicine?
Most applicants prepared for the interview by reviewing their application materials, researching the school's mission and values, practicing with mock interviews, and reading through Student Doctor Network (SDN) for common interview questions and feedback. Suggestions included focusing on understanding healthcare issues specific to the school's location and reviewing personal statements and secondary applications thoroughly.
Top 5 Responses: (Click below to see additional responses)
I looked over my own application, topics affecting healthcare, the schools mission and values. I would suggest looking over issues affecting Scranton PA specifically.
Re-read my personal statement and secondary, reviewed the ACA, learned about public health issues that Northeastern PA is dealing with, reviewed the Commonwealth website.
Didn't really, but I don't think that it influenced the interview. I think that it helped me to be more like myself and just talk rather than reciting answers that I had reviewed so many times.
Students said most difficult question asked at The Commonwealth Medical College discussed various topics such as ethical dilemmas in patient care, healthcare challenges, personal strengths and weaknesses, and opinions on healthcare reform. While some mentioned specific questions like the difference between empathy and sympathy, others noted a conversational interview style with faculty members and hypothetical scenarios related to healthcare and ethics.
Top 5 Responses: (Click below to see additional responses)
None were particularly difficult - except my interviewer was a faculty member who did most of the talking and was rambling about random stuff. He didn't really ask me questions.
The faculty interviewer asked me to tell him about myself, which was the hardest question he asked. And if you practice how to answer that, which I did, it's not that difficult.
Applicants were consistently impressed by the friendliness and enthusiasm of the faculty, students, and admissions staff at Geisinger. The brand new state-of-the-art facilities, emphasis on student feedback, and the welcoming and conversational interview atmosphere were highlighted as positive aspects of the school.
Top 5 Responses: (Click below to see additional responses)
Both interviewers were really nice and the whole thing felt more like a conversation than an interview.
The interviewer were very porfessional, but very personable. They made me feel like I was apart of the team already. This interview shot Geisinger to the top of my list.
The interviewers do not look at your GPA or MCAT score. They only read your AMCAS personal statement and secondary application.
The students and interviewers are very friendly and welcoming. They act as if you are already accepted.
How well the entire staff tries to make you calm down and feel relaxed. They really just want to get to know you as a person so they want you to relax while you are there.
The new building will be open by the time the class of 2015 arrives. Mission is great and curriculum seems really innovative. Faculty is very enthusiastic about the program.
The organization of the day and the admissions office. The people at this school are very passionate about medical education and very positive about the practice of medicine and its future.
Pretty much everything. The passion of all the staff, faculty, and students to carry out their mission blew me away. They are implementing some truly cutting edge curriculum changes. They are completely dedicated to the success of their students. The students themselves - I could see myself being friends with them.
The curriculum seems like it will be very successful. I loved how the class size will be small for the next couple years, and that the students work in small groups, and do clinical research.
The dedication and friendliness of the admissions staff and faculty. They all seemed genuinely excited and happy about their school. Also, the anatomy lab is brand new and amazing (not smelly!) The students seemed to be happy, as well.
Applicants were negatively impressed by factors such as long and unorganized Zoom calls, lack of enthusiasm from interviewers and current students, concerns about the school's curriculum changes, limited facilities and resources, as well as the rural location of the school. Suggestions include improving interview experiences, providing clearer information, enhancing student engagement, and addressing facility limitations to create a more positive impression on prospective students.
Top 5 Responses: (Click below to see additional responses)
1 hour diversity lecture was overly hammy...students had no criticism of the school. no one could accurately inform us how the longitudinal clinical rotations worked
They are a relatively new program, so they are still changing a lot of their curriculum which makes me nervous especially as it pertains to performance on standardized exams throughout medical school.
The school isn't attached to a hospital as is the case with other schools. The presenter of the power-point session on the school and its curriculum was very monotone and unenthusiastic
The M1 tour guides were not extremely peppy, excited about their school, or helpful. The student interviewer seemed disinterested. The faculty interviewer was more interested in selling the school's primary care agenda than learning about me as an applicant.
We didn't get to have lunch with the students (I think they had something else going on), but it would have been nice to hear their opinions about the school. The students we met during the panel seemed pretty neutral about the school.
Sadly, though Scranton is a great town I'm sure, it is very rural and on the small side. Personal choice. Also, the possibility of no access to federal loans for the first year.
I'm used to bigger cities, so Scranton seemed a little small for me. However, it seems as though the community is really involved in and excited about the school.
The current facilities are in part of a community college and are very limited. The student panel mentioned that they didn't have a student lounge or anywhere to congregate and relax. Also, the student tour guide said that there wasn't much research going on at yet.
Applicants commonly wished they had known more about the interview format, such as the types of questions asked and the sequence of faculty and student interviews. Additionally, many mentioned the challenges with parking and the need to be prepared for walking on hilly terrain during the visit.
Top 5 Responses: (Click below to see additional responses)
Geisinger had no dedicated step 1 prep time, and doesn't have a concrete plan in place to remediate it
My interview with the medical student was more challenging than the one with the faculty member. The med student seemed more nervous than me. Also, the interviews were done first, which I liked. You could just devote the rest of the day to enjoying the school and its students.
Most respondents rank the facilities as above average.
How would you rate the Location and Cultural Life?
0 = Low, 10 = High
How is the friendliness of the admissions office?
Most respondents said the admissions office was friendly.
How is the responsiveness of the admissions office?
Most respondents said the admissions office was responsive.
What are your suggestions for the admissions office?
Applicants commonly suggest that the admissions office should provide quicker decisions, improve communication consistency, offer more information during interviews, and consider implementing rolling admissions for reduced stress on applicants. They also mention the need for better presenter/speakers, improved lunch options, and potential changes to the interview day schedule.
Top 5 Responses: (Click below to see additional responses)
6-8 week is very lengthy...some students have waited 11 weeks for a decision this cycle
Wow, Geisinger admissions committee impressed me more than I can say. What a professional, caring and responsive staff. There is a reason Geisinger is shooting up every year in medical school rankings.
I suggest they consider moving to a rolling type of admissions rather than block admissions. It is nice to know what day you will hear back from them, but it is stressful as well.
17% interviewees used Wilkes-Barre (Wilkes-Barre), with 17% using Philadelphia (Philadelphia) and 17% using scranton/wilkes-barre airport (scranton/wilkes-barre airport) and 17% using Wilkes-Barre/Scranton Airport (Wilkes-Barre/Scranton Airport) and 17% using Wilkes-Barres (Wilkes-Barres) and 17% using virtual interview (virtual interview).
What was your primary mode of transportation?
Most interviewees traveled by automobile to the interview.
✈️
15% Airplane
🚗
78% Automobile
🚆
2% Train or Subway
🚲
5% Other
Hotels Recommended by Other Interviewees
Most interviewees stayed at the Hilton (average ranking 8.9/10), with some staying at Radisson (average rating 7.3/10). (Top 3 displayed)
🏨
Hilton
8.9/10
🏨
Radisson
7.3/10
🏨
Hilton - has free airport to school and airport
10/10
What was the cost and time spent traveling?
Cost: Low Cost to High Cost
What is your in-state status?
Most respondents are in state students.
Where did you stay?
Most respondents stayed either Hotel or at a hotel.
Who was the tour given by?
Tours were most commonly given by a Student
Admissions staff (17%)
Other (2%)
Student (81%)
How did the tour guide seem?
Most tour guides were enthusiastic about the school.
Enthusiastic (76%)
Neutral (24%)
All Responses
Loading responses...
No responses found.
Application Cycle ▿
Impression
Performance
Interview Location
Success!
School has been added to your favorites.
AI Advisor
Ask questions about this school. Answers use aggregated data and are subject to error.