How many people interviewed you?
Response Average | # Responders |
---|---|
2.71 | 7 |
Response | # Responders |
---|---|
Positively | 3 |
Negatively | 3 |
No change | 1 |
Response Avg | # Responders |
---|---|
3.60 | 5 |
Response Avg | # Responders |
---|---|
6.71 | 7 |
Response Avg | # Responders |
---|---|
7.43 | 7 |
No responses
Response | # Responders |
---|---|
5 minutes | 0 |
10 minutes | 0 |
15 minutes | 0 |
20 minutes | 0 |
25 minutes | 0 |
30 minutes | 2 |
35 minutes | 1 |
40 minutes | 0 |
45 minutes | 0 |
50 minutes | 0 |
55 minutes | 0 |
60+ minutes | 4 |
Response | # Responders |
---|---|
At the school | 7 |
At a regional location | 0 |
At another location | 0 |
Response | # Responders |
---|---|
One-on-one | 5 |
In a group | 2 |
Response | # Responders |
---|---|
Open file | 3 |
Closed file | 1 |
Response Average | # Responders |
---|---|
2.71 | 7 |
"Looked up info and articles on the faculty I was interviewing with. Reviewed my application, reviewed the schools program (via the website), wrote up a list of questions."
"Reading about POI's research extensively."
"Read papers by POI and make sure I was well versed in the most recent literature regarding what I wanted to study"
"Read over professor's research, the program, clinical experiences at the program. "
"read articles, bios, abstracts of my POI's, read all about program and read bios and interesting abstracts of other faculty, and of course practiced questions (for them, for me) and thought about my own application."
"Academically the school seems top notch."
"POI was very interesting and interested. The interview was more of a discussion of interests. The students seem really happy and well-bonded as a group."
"The faculty and students were SO NICE. They are seemed very happy. "
"Both students and professors were really friendly, approachable. There were 2 interviews: one was one-on-one and one was in a group. The group one was more of an introduce yourself and then question and answers about the program."
"smart DT and students, partnership w/ AECOM, MPH training if wish, 3 years of externships. "
"Nothing"
"Kind admissions director."
"The day was poorly organized and chaotic. The location is bad, but close enough to Manhattan. The facilities are okay - the clinic is pretty small and in the basement (along with most classes)."
"General lack of funding for students. Building itself isn't too flashy, but location is a quick commute to Manhattan."
"Location IS in the bronx. Building inside isn't that nice. "
"The whole thing seemed pretty unorganized."
"no tour, no meeting with other faculty, nothing. this is a great program, and it advertises itself horribly, and is talked about on the NYC interview in a somewhat negative way as a result. the students themselves seemed very smart and driven and happy (despite the lack of funding), but i made a real effort to search out people to talk to. needs a serious pr makeover."
"Rude interviewer; campus is none-existent; were left to search for students to talk with; didn't get to meet any other faculty than the 1 or 2 ppl that interviewed you; admissions staff not interested in providing a tour; they had no interest in allowing us to ask any questions about the program"
"No tour, applicants were left to fend for themselves among the coming and going student body in order to try to glean any information about the program."
"Not to stress out so much!! The professor I interviewed with was so friendly and I never felt as if I were being grilled."
"no chance to meet other faculty, no tour. i was surprised at these omissions (it was my first interview) and would have been more proactive about exploring the facilities and campus. also, express bus is $ and made me carsick, and subject to the vagaries of NYC traffic -- take the train!"
"Actual interview was only a few minutes; for those of us flying in from out of state and out of country this is an expensive trip;"
"I had 1 interview with just me, a faculty member and 2 current students. Then there was a group interview with about 7 or 8 applicants, 2 faculty members and 1 current student. The group interview was more of a Q & A - everyone said where they went to school and what their research interests are. The faculty told us about the program and gave us time to ask questions."
"Overall, impressed me positively - I didn't anticipate liking it as much as I did"
"This is for the Clinical PsyD program."
"the student was great, but the faculty interview left me feeling shaky and like i failed (even though i ended up getting in). is ultimately an excellent program, best health psych training save maybe rutgers, in the NYC area and an amazing access to AECOM and public health training, but has AWFUL marketing -- a program for the bold, enterprising, and self starters. "
"Learning experience; glad I went through it, but not interested anymore in this school. Treated the candidates poorly during the interview process."
"Autonomy is key @ the Yeshiva interview."
Response | # Responders |
---|---|
Student | 4 |
Faculty member | 0 |
Admissions staff | 0 |
Other | 0 |
Response | # Responders |
---|---|
Enthusiastic | 4 |
Neutral | 0 |
Discouraging | 0 |
Response Avg | # Responders |
---|---|
5.00 | 6 |
Response | # Responders |
---|---|
In state | 4 |
Out of state | 3 |
Response | # Responders |
---|---|
0-1 hour | 2 |
2-3 hours | 3 |
4-6 hours | 0 |
7+ hours | 2 |
Response | # Responders |
---|---|
Airplane | 2 |
Automobile | 1 |
Train or subway | 3 |
Other | 1 |
HPN
LGA
Response | # Responders |
---|---|
At school facility | 0 |
With students at the school | 0 |
Friends or family | 1 |
Hotel | 2 |
Home | 0 |
Other | 0 |
Response | # Responders |
---|---|
< $100 | 1 |
$101-$200 | 0 |
$201-$300 | 2 |
$301-$400 | 0 |
$401-$500 | 0 |
$501+ | 1 |
Response Avg | # Responders |
---|---|
7.29 | 7 |
Response Avg | # Responders |
---|---|
3.43 | 7 |
Response Avg | # Responders |
---|---|
7.00 | 7 |
Response Avg | # Responders |
---|---|
4.25 | 4 |
Response Avg | # Responders |
---|---|
6.75 | 4 |
Response Avg | # Responders |
---|---|
8.67 | 3 |
What is one of the specific questions they asked you (question 1)?